spalencsar/bearhub
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/spalencsar/bearhub.git synced 2026-07-08 21:14:15 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Release 0.10.7-bearhub.6

Browse Source 
Complete M1 identity work, fix runtime URL regressions, repair the test
suite, add CI, migrate packaging/AppImage branding to Bearhub, and
document the Qt6/PySide6 migration plan.
This commit is contained in:
Sebastian Palencsar
2026-06-26 19:22:28 +02:00
parent 63698709a6
commit 4a119968bc
35 changed files with 1984 additions and 224 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

53
tests/gems/arch/test_updates.py
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
from unittest import TestCase
from unittest.mock import patch, Mock, MagicMock
from bauh import __app_name__
from bauh.api.abstract.controller import UpgradeRequirement
from bauh.gems.arch.dependencies import DependenciesAnalyser
from bauh.gems.arch.model import ArchPackage
@@ -28,7 +27,7 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
"prefer_repository_provider": True,
"check_dependency_breakage": True}
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__should_not_return_installed_to_remove_when_conflict_with_installed_version_fails(self, pacman: Mock):
"""
If the newest version o package A conflicts with an installed package named B, but the conflict expression
@@ -76,7 +75,7 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
self.assertFalse(res.to_install)
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_a, required_size=1, extra_size=0)], res.to_upgrade)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__should_return_installed_to_remove_when_conflict_with_installed_version_matches(self, pacman: Mock):
"""
If the newest version o package A conflicts with an installed package named B and the conflict expression
@@ -130,7 +129,7 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
pkg_b = ArchPackage(name="B", installed=True, i18n=self.i18n)
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_b, reason=" 'A'", extra_size=1)], res.to_remove)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__should_return_installed_to_remove_when_conflict_with_installed_matches(self, pacman: Mock):
"""
If the newest version o package A conflicts with an installed package named B,
@@ -184,7 +183,7 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
pkg_b = ArchPackage(name="B", installed=True, i18n=self.i18n)
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_b, reason=" 'A'", extra_size=1)], res.to_remove)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__should_not_return_installed_to_remove_when_conflict_with_is_self_conflict(self, pacman: Mock):
"""
If the newest version o package A conflicts with itself, then A should not be marked as a package to be removed.
@@ -226,7 +225,7 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
self.assertFalse(res.to_install)
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_a, required_size=1, extra_size=0)], res.to_upgrade)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__should_not_return_installed_to_remove_when_conflict_with_provided_version_fails(self, pacman: Mock):
"""
If the newest version o package A conflicts with a provided package C (by installed package B),
@@ -273,7 +272,7 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
self.assertFalse(res.to_install)
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_a, required_size=1, extra_size=0)], res.to_upgrade)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__not_return_to_remove_when_conflict_with_provided_virtual_package_with_version_fails(self, pacman: Mock):
"""
Scenario:
@@ -325,7 +324,7 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
self.assertFalse(res.to_install)
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_a, required_size=1, extra_size=0)], res.to_upgrade)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__return_installed_virtual_with_defined_version_to_remove_when_conflict_version_matches(self, pacman: Mock):
"""
Scenario:
@@ -390,7 +389,7 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
pkg_b = ArchPackage(name="X", installed=True, i18n=self.i18n)
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_b, reason=" 'V'", extra_size=1)], res.to_remove)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__return_installed_virtual_with_defined_version_to_remove_when_conflict_matches__case_2(self, pacman: Mock):
"""
This test case covers the same scenario as the above, but adds an additional provider for the same
@@ -466,7 +465,7 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
pkg_b = ArchPackage(name="X", installed=True, i18n=self.i18n)
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_b, reason=" 'V'", extra_size=1)], res.to_remove)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__should_return_installed_package_to_remove_when_conflict_with_provided_matches_version(self, pacman: Mock):
"""
If the newest version o package A conflicts with a provided package C (by installed package B),
@@ -523,7 +522,7 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
pkg_b = ArchPackage(name="B", installed=True, i18n=self.i18n)
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_b, reason=" 'A'", extra_size=1)], res.to_remove)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__should_return_installed_package_to_remove_when_conflict_with_provided_matches(self, pacman: Mock):
"""
If the newest version o package A conflicts with a provided package C (by installed package B),
@@ -579,7 +578,7 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
pkg_b = ArchPackage(name="B", installed=True, i18n=self.i18n)
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_b, reason=" 'A'", extra_size=1)], res.to_remove)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__should_not_return_installed_to_remove_when_conflict_with_provider_is_self_conflict(self, pacman: Mock):
"""
If the newest version o package A conflicts with a provided package C (by A itself),
@@ -622,7 +621,7 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
self.assertFalse(res.to_install)
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_a, required_size=1, extra_size=0)], res.to_upgrade)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__return_as_cannot_upgrade_when_several_to_upgrade_conflict_with_each_other(self, pacman: Mock):
"""
Consider package A and B are selected to be upgraded:
@@ -682,7 +681,7 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
self.assertIn(UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_a, reason=" 'B'"), res.cannot_upgrade)
self.assertIn(UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_b, reason=" 'A'"), res.cannot_upgrade)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__return_as_cannot_upgrade_when_several_to_upgrade_conflict_with_provided_by_each_other(self, pacman: Mock):
"""
Consider package A and B are selected to be upgraded:
@@ -744,7 +743,7 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
self.assertIn(UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_a, reason=" 'B'"), res.cannot_upgrade)
self.assertIn(UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_b, reason=" 'A'"), res.cannot_upgrade)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__return_as_to_remove_when_a_package_to_upgrade_conflicts_with_another(self, pacman: Mock):
"""
Consider package A and B are selected to be upgraded:
@@ -806,7 +805,7 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_a, required_size=1, extra_size=0)], res.to_upgrade)
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_b, reason=" 'A'", extra_size=1)], res.to_remove)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__return_as_to_remove_when_a_package_to_upgrade_conflicts_with_provided_by_another(self, pacman: Mock):
"""
Consider package A and B are selected to be upgraded:
@@ -871,7 +870,7 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_a, required_size=1, extra_size=0)], res.to_upgrade)
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_b, reason=" 'A'", extra_size=1)], res.to_remove)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__return_as_to_remove_when_a_package_to_upgrade_conflicts_with_provided_version_by_another(self, pacman: Mock):
"""
Consider package A and B are selected to be upgraded:
@@ -937,8 +936,8 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_a, required_size=1, extra_size=0)], res.to_upgrade)
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_b, reason=" 'A'", extra_size=1)], res.to_remove)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.dependencies.pacman")
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.dependencies.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__return_as_cannot_upgrade_when_several_packages_to_install_conflict_with_each_other(self, *mocks: Mock):
"""
Consider package A and B are selected to be upgraded:
@@ -1039,8 +1038,8 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
self.assertIn(UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_a, reason="'C' 'D'"), res.cannot_upgrade)
self.assertIn(UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_b, reason="'C' 'D'"), res.cannot_upgrade)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.dependencies.pacman")
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.dependencies.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__return_as_cannot_upgrade_when_packages_to_install_conflict_with_version_of_each_other(self, *mocks: Mock):
"""
Consider package A and B are selected to be upgraded:
@@ -1141,8 +1140,8 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
self.assertIn(UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_a, reason="'C' 'D'"), res.cannot_upgrade)
self.assertIn(UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_b, reason="'C' 'D'"), res.cannot_upgrade)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.dependencies.pacman")
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.dependencies.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__return_as_to_remove_when_to_update_conflicts_with_to_install(self, *mocks: Mock):
"""
Consider package A and B are selected to be upgraded:
@@ -1228,8 +1227,8 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_a, required_size=1, extra_size=0)], res.to_upgrade)
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_b, extra_size=1, reason=" 'C'")], res.to_remove)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.dependencies.pacman")
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.dependencies.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__return_as_to_remove_when_to_update_conflicts_with_specific_version_of_install(self, *mocks: Mock):
"""
Consider package A and B are selected to be upgraded:
@@ -1315,8 +1314,8 @@ class UpdatesSummarizerGetUpgradeRequirementsTest(TestCase):
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_a, required_size=1, extra_size=0)], res.to_upgrade)
self.assertEqual([UpgradeRequirement(pkg=pkg_b, extra_size=1, reason=" 'C'")], res.to_remove)
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.dependencies.pacman")
@patch(f"{__app_name__}.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.dependencies.pacman")
@patch("bauh.gems.arch.updates.pacman")
def test__return_as_to_remove_when_to_update_conflicts_with_to_install_and_it_has_deps(self, *mocks: Mock):
"""
Consider package A and B are selected to be upgraded: